EXHIBIT 4: [PROPOSED] EXHIBITS TO SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF JOEL FLEMING Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:15283 EXHIBIT A Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 2 of 19 Page ID #:15284 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 SOUTHERN DIVISION 3 _______________________________ 4 ) JOYCE WALKER, KIM BRUCE ) 5 HOWLETT, and MURIEL SPOONER, ) on behalf of themselves and ) 6 all others similarly situated, ) ) 7 Plaintiffs, ) ) 8 vs. ) No. CV 10-9198-JVS (RNBx) ) 9 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) THE SOUTHWEST, a Texas ) 10 corporation, and DOES 1-50, ) ) 11 Defendants. ) ) 12 _______________________________) 13 14 15 DEPOSITION OF JOYCE WALKER 16 San Francisco, California 17 Friday, January 27, 2012 18 Volume I 19 20 21 Reported by: GINA GLANTZ 22 CSR No. 9795, RPR, RMR 23 JOB No. 131931 24 25 PAGES 1 - 244 Page 1 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 3 of 19 Page ID #:15285 1 we up to? 2 THE REPORTER: 19. 3 (Walker Exhibit 19 was marked.) 4 MR. SHAPIRO: Maybe the court reporter can just 5 mark the one that Charlie -- if you wouldn't mind. 6 MR. FREIBERG: That's 20. 7 THE REPORTER: I don't have a 20 yet. 8 BY MR. SHAPIRO: 9 Q The court reporter has handed you a document which 10 has been marked as Walker Exhibit 19, and it bears a Bates 11 number JW000678. Do you recognize your signature at the 12 bottom of that? 13 A Yes, I do. 14 Q And the date next to that? 15 A 1/11/08. 16 Q On January 11th, 2008, did you sign your name 17 acknowledging your receipt of your life insurance policy, 18 a life insurance buyer's guide, an IUL buyer's guide and a 19 proposal which matches the policy you received? 20 A I did sign this on that date. 21 Q Did you get each of those documents that are 22 referenced in the one sentence above which you signed? 23 A I received the policy, the buyer's guide, but not 24 an illustration. 25 Q Okay. Just so we're clear, you received the Page 205 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 4 of 19 Page ID #:15286 1 policy, the life insurance buyer's guide, and also the IUL 2 buyer's guide? 3 A I don't know what the IUL buyer's guide is, so I 4 don't know what that is. 5 Q Okay. Well, fair to say, on January 11th, 2008, 6 you certified with your signature that you received those 7 first three things, correct, the policy, the life 8 insurance buyer's guide and the IUL buyer's guide? 9 A It says "if applicable" and I don't know if it was 10 applicable. 11 Q Okay. So you read "if applicable" applying to the 12 IUL buyer's guide? 13 A Correct. 14 Q Okay. Let's take the first one, the policy. Did 15 you get a copy of your life insurance policy? 16 A I did. 17 Q Did you read it? 18 A I did not. I assumed that the illustration from 19 October 3rd would be a fair and accurate description -- 20 depiction of the policy. 21 Q Okay. So just so we're clear, on this date, 22 January 11, 2008, you handed over a check for $112,000? 23 A That is correct. 24 Q And you handed over a check for $112,000 for a 25 life insurance policy; correct? Page 206 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 5 of 19 Page ID #:15287 1 MR. FREIBERG: Objection. Argumentative. 2 THE WITNESS: I handed over a check for a 3 retirement vehicle that I believed would perform as in the 4 illustration. 5 BY MR. SHAPIRO: 6 Q Okay. And -- 7 A I mean -- 8 Q You were handed -- 9 A I'm sorry. 10 Q No, keep going. 11 A At this juncture, where I'm sending -- handing 12 over a check and the policy is coming from Mr. Botkin and 13 Mr. Stemler, my buying decision had already been made. 14 Q Okay. So in the same meeting, you handed this 15 gentleman a check for $112,000, right, and you got, in 16 return, a bunch of documents, one of which was something 17 called a life insurance policy that you purchased; right? 18 A Yes. 19 Q Did you have an opportunity to read that life 20 insurance policy if you wanted to? 21 A Not at that time, I did not. 22 Q Did you take it home with you that night? 23 A I left a few minutes after this very short meeting 24 to go to Los Angeles to work for the better part of the 25 next few weeks, and I did not take it with me. Page 207 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 6 of 19 Page ID #:15288 1 Q Okay. So your schedule was busy, so you decided 2 not to read the life insurance policy? 3 A I decided not to read it because I assumed that 4 the October 3rd illustration, which had been used 5 extensively in the explanation of the policy, was a fair 6 and accurate depiction of the policy. 7 Q Have you ever read the life insurance policy? 8 A I read parts of it while preparing for the -- 9 writing the letter to Brenda, and have read parts of it in 10 preparing for the deposition. 11 Q Did anyone prevent you from reading that life 12 insurance policy, ma'am? 13 A No. 14 Q Was that your decision? 15 A It was my decision, based on the time that -- the 16 illustration was a depiction, a fair and accurate and 17 complete depiction, of the policy. 18 Q As you sit here today, do you think it was a good 19 idea not to read the life insurance policy? 20 A I can't say. 21 Q Today, if you were to buy a product that's called 22 the life insurance policy, and hand over a check for 23 $112,000, would you read it? 24 MR. FREIBERG: Objection. Incomplete and improper 25 hypothetical. Page 208 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 7 of 19 Page ID #:15289 1 THE WITNESS: I don't know what I would do. 2 BY MR. SHAPIRO: 3 Q Okay. Did you read the life insurance buyer's 4 guide? 5 A I did not. 6 Q Was that your decision? 7 A Yes. 8 Q Fair to say if you don't know if you actually 9 received an IUL buyer's guide, you don't know if you 10 actually read an IUL buyer's guide? 11 A Correct, I don't know what IUL stands for. If you 12 know, that could clarify for me if I -- if it's a document 13 that I received. 14 Q You signed a certification acknowledging receipt 15 of a number of items, if applicable, and you don't know 16 what one of those items mean? 17 MR. FREIBERG: Objection. Argumentative, asked 18 and answered. 19 THE WITNESS: That's correct. It looks as if this 20 statement says "if applicable." 21 BY MR. SHAPIRO: 22 Q Okay. You just don't know -- 23 A Which could mean -- 24 Q -- if you got it or not? 25 A Which could mean that that was not applicable or Page 209 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 8 of 19 Page ID #:15290 1 that one or the other was applicable. I can't -- I don't 2 know at this point which one the "if applicable" refers 3 to. 4 Q Did you receive a proposal "which matches the 5 policy I received"? 6 A I did not. 7 Q Okay. So that part of your acknowledging receipt 8 is just simply false? 9 A I signed an illustration, but did not receive a 10 copy of that illustration. 11 Q I'm just looking at this exhibit, which is Walker 12 Exhibit No. 19, and there's something called an owner's 13 signature. It's your signature, and you're signing one 14 sentence in which you're acknowledging receipt of some 15 documents. The last document you're acknowledging receipt 16 of is something called a proposal, which matches the 17 policy you received; right? 18 A Um-hmm, yes. 19 Q Okay. Is this a true acknowledgment that you 20 signed? 21 MR. FREIBERG: Objection. Asked and answered, 22 argumentative. 23 THE WITNESS: What I believe occurred is that I 24 had an illustration placed in front of me, was signed, but 25 was not left with me, and possibly, I was told, that I Page 210 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 9 of 19 Page ID #:15291 EXHIBIT B Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 10 of 19 Page ID #:15292 194 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION --oOo-- JOYCE WALKER, KIM BRUCE HOWLETT, and MURIEL SPOONER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. CV-10-9198-JVS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST, a Texas corporation, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DEPOSITION OF KIM BRUCE HOWLETT Thursday, May 10, 2012 VOLUME II (Pages 194 - 289) 2:10 P.M. 101 California Street 23rd Floor San Francisco, California Corey W. Anderson, CSR 4096 KIM BRUCE HOWLETT - Volume II May 10, 2012 Toll Free: 800.211.DEPO Facsimile: 415.591.3335 Suite 1100 44 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 www.esquiresolutions.com Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 11 of 19 Page ID #:15293 219 1 you buy a policy? 2 MR. FREIBERG: Objection. Argumentative. 3 THE WITNESS: I bought a policy based on 4 the July 27th illustration. 5 BY MR. SHAPIRO: 6 Q. Did you ever read the policy you 7 purchased? 8 A. I have not read the policy. 9 Q. Ever in your life? 10 A. I have read a portion. 11 Q. When? 12 A. As part of information that was compiled 13 by my legal team. 14 Q. Before or after you sued? 15 A. After. 16 Q. So it's your testimony that you bought an 17 insurance policy, but never read it until after you 18 filed a class action lawsuit based on the policy? 19 A. I purchased a policy based on the July 20 27th illustration. 21 Q. Did you -- 22 MR. FREIBERG: Wait. 23 THE WITNESS: I did not -- and I did not 24 read it subsequently, subsequent to purchase. 25 BY MR. SHAPIRO: KIM BRUCE HOWLETT - Volume II May 10, 2012 Toll Free: 800.211.DEPO Facsimile: 415.591.3335 Suite 1100 44 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 www.esquiresolutions.com Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 12 of 19 Page ID #:15294 220 1 Q. Did you have a chance to read your 2 insurance policy? 3 A. Yes. 4 Q. Was it your decision not to? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. And you take responsibility for that 7 decision as well, sir. 8 Right? 9 MR. FREIBERG: Objection, vague and 10 ambiguous. 11 THE WITNESS: Yes. 12 BY MR. SHAPIRO: 13 Q. And notwithstanding your counsel's 14 objection, you understand what it means to take 15 responsibility for something. 16 Right? 17 MR. FREIBERG: Objection, vague and 18 ambiguous. 19 THE WITNESS: I think it depends on the 20 context as to what you mean by responsibility. 21 BY MR. SHAPIRO: 22 Q. Are you responsible for the honesty of the 23 court papers that are put in front of the federal 24 court with your name on it? 25 MR. FREIBERG: Objection, vague, KIM BRUCE HOWLETT - Volume II May 10, 2012 Toll Free: 800.211.DEPO Facsimile: 415.591.3335 Suite 1100 44 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 www.esquiresolutions.com Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 13 of 19 Page ID #:15295 EXHIBIT C Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 14 of 19 Page ID #:15296 Page 1 ·1 ·2· · · · · · · · UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT ·3· · · · · · · · CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ·4 ·5· ·JOYCE WALKER, KIM BRUCE HOWLETT, · · ·and MURIEL SPOONER, on behalf ·6· ·of themselves and all others · · ·similarly situated, ·7 ·8· · · · · · · · · · · Plaintiffs, ·9· · · · · · ·v.· · · · · · · · · · ·CASE NO.: · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 10-9198JVS(RNBx) 10· ·LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE · · ·SOUTHWEST, a Texas corporation, 11 12· · · · · · · · · · · ·Defendant. 13· · · · ·˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜ 14· · · · · · · · · · · · ·CONFIDENTIAL 15· · · · · · · · · VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF 16· · · · · · · · · · · MURIEL L. SPOONER 17 18· · · · · · · · · · · · ·June 29, 2012 19· · · · · · · · · · · · · 9:10 a.m. 20 21· · · · · ·Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP 22· · · · · · · 101 California Street, Suite 2300 23· · · · · · · ·San Francisco, California 94111 24 25· · · · · ·Reported by Mary Goff - CSR · · · · · · ·California Certificate No. 13427 MURIEL L. SPOONER· WALKER vs. LIFE INS. CO. OF THE S.W. June 29, 2012 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com MURIEL L. SPOONER· WALKER vs. LIFE INS. CO. OF THE S.W. June 29, 2012 Confidential 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 15 of 19 Page ID #:15297 Page 156 ·1· ·to read your insurance policy carefully? ·2· · · · · · ·MR. FREIBERG:· Objection; vague and ambiguous. ·3· · · · A· · They -- had -- had they had this on the list ·4· ·of important things to consider.· So yeah, you know, it ·5· ·would be something you would consider doing. ·6· · · · Q· · (BY MR. SHAPIRO) Did you read your policy ·7· ·carefully, as stated by the National Association of ·8· ·Insurance Commissioners? ·9· · · · A· · No. 10· · · · Q· · Did you read your policy at all? 11· · · · A· · Not after just receiving it, no. 12· · · · Q· · Have you ever in your life read your insurance 13· ·policy? 14· · · · A· · I have read through it now. 15· · · · Q· · When was the first time you read your 16· ·insurance policy? 17· · · · A· · Again, reading through it when we went through 18· ·it with our -- with Jack Dugan. 19· · · · Q· · So what, more than a year after you purchased 20· ·it? 21· · · · A· · Approximately, yes. 22· · · · Q· · Any reason why you couldn't have read the 23· ·insurance policy when it was provided to you and you 24· ·acknowledged receiving it in October of 2007? 25· · · · A· · No.· There would be no reason. MURIEL L. SPOONER· WALKER vs. LIFE INS. CO. OF THE S.W. June 29, 2012 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com MURIEL L. SPOONER· WALKER vs. LIFE INS. CO. OF THE S.W. June 29, 2012 Confidential 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com YVer1f Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 16 of 19 Page ID #:15298 Page 232 ·1· · · · A· · Yes. ·2· · · · Q· · And that was the same evening meeting in which ·3· ·you and your husband reviewed for the first time the ·4· ·July 27 illustration, correct? ·5· · · · A· · Yes, that is correct. ·6· · · · Q· · Sequentially in that meeting, which did you do ·7· ·first, dictate your application or review the ·8· ·illustration? ·9· · · · A· · I don't recall the order. 10· · · · Q· · Okay.· Do you remember -- strike that. 11· · · · · · ·Were you also in Mr. Cooper's office on 12· ·October 11, 2007, when he reviewed with you the as 13· ·issued illustration -- 14· · · · · · ·MR. FREIBERG:· Objection. 15· · · · Q· · (BY MR. SHAPIRO) -- Spooner Exhibit 12? 16· · · · · · ·MR. FREIBERG:· Objection; misstates the 17· ·testimony of the witness. 18· · · · A· · As I recall, we met in his office to receive 19· ·this. 20· · · · Q· · (BY MR. SHAPIRO) Were you in a conference room 21· ·or in his office? 22· · · · A· · To my best recollection, it was his office. 23· · · · Q· · Husband was there, right? 24· · · · A· · Yes, that's correct. 25· · · · Q· · Anyone else in the room? MURIEL L. SPOONER· WALKER vs. LIFE INS. CO. OF THE S.W. June 29, 2012 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com MURIEL L. SPOONER· WALKER vs. LIFE INS. CO. OF THE S.W. June 29, 2012 Confidential 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com YVer1f Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 17 of 19 Page ID #:15299 EXHIBIT D Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 18 of 19 Page ID #:15300 Confidential Polic' Cost mid Benefit Siumnaty Prepared for JOYCE ANN SCHMIDTBAUERLSOI566I000-UDA 3H14 Presentad by JEFFREY SThMLER $2.464.759 LSW Provider with benets previoIy described. Guaranteed Guaranteed Guaranteed Current Basis B Current Basis B Cuitent Basis B Policy Annual EndYear Net EndYearNet Annual End YcarNet En&Year Net Year CashFlow Cashvalue DeathBeneflt Cash Flow Cash Value5 Deathfleneflt Averaged Avenged Averaged Net Policy Annual Net Equity Death Benefit Year Cash Flow5 End Year5 End Year* 5 $ (112.637) $ 488,472 $ 2,464.759 10 0 567,822 2,464,759 20 (48,198) 1.230,285 2,464,759 (I-) 23 (48,198) 1,543,496 2,464,759 U) t) 5ßenpflls and values are not guaranteed. The assumptions on which they are based are subject to changØy the" insurer. Attuai results may be mote or leas favorable. I have received a copy of this illuscratlon mid understand that any non-guarthtteed elements illustralad are snbjec change and could be either higher or lower. The agent hua told me they are nut guaqmtoed. I UNDERSTAND TRAT HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE OF THE SSc? 500 INDEX SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A REPRESENTATION OF THE PAST OR FUTURE PERFORMANCE VOR ANY OF THE INDEXED STRATEOmS IN TUE POLICY. Date /O Applicant By JOYCE ANN SCHMIDTBAUE1t I cex1il3 that this illustration bas been presented to the applicant and thai I have explained that any non-guaranteed elements Waned are subject to change. I have made no statements iare onsistent with the Illustration. Date//Il/ak LIFE mzsuRMIcs COMPANY or WE SOUTHWEST, DALLAS, IX 75247-4921 Decznber 27, 2007 This illustration is not complete without all pages. Pago 23o1 23 TC37133(1007) Y73 4) ',4tU EXHIBIT NO .2- ¿) DATE - il GINA GLANTZ- NO. 9795 Age 48 Verified Standard NT Female State- CA LSW 00002303 .5 19 20 23 $ (112.637) 0 (48,198) (48,198) $446,792 423,404 580,267 627,048 $2,464.759 2,464,759 2,464,759 2,464,759 $ (112,637) 0 (48,198) (48,198) $ 533,218 734,572 2,086,807 2,817,349 5 2,464,759 2.464,759 2,464,759 3,239,952 Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 346-4 Filed 10/02/12 Page 19 of 19 Page ID #:15301