1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE Case No. CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOYCE WALKER, KIM BRUCE HOWLETT, and MURIEL SPOONER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST, a Texas corporation, Defendant. CASE NO.: CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE Having considered Plaintiffs Joyce Walker’s, Kim Bruce Howlett’s, and Muriel Spooner’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Approval of Class Notice and LSW’s papers in opposition thereto, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion and approves Plaintiffs’ proposed class notice (attached to Plaintiffs’ Proposed Order and as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Charles N. Freiberg) for dissemination to the class in accordance with the Court’s November 9, 2013 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. The Court also GRANTS Plaintiffs’ request for an order directing LSW to instruct its agents and employees not to discuss the class notice, this lawsuit, or any issues directly related thereto with class members throughout the remainder of this lawsuit, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. LSW shall disseminate this instruction to all of its agents and employees by mass email or by such other method ordinarily used by LSW in the course of its business to send mass Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:17761 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE Case No. CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx) communications to its agents and employees that best ensures that this instruction is received by LSW’s agents and employees. LSW shall send this instruction by no later than 10 days prior to the date that the class notice is mailed to the class. Nothing in this order shall prevent LSW or its agents or employees from continuing to communicate with class members in the ordinary course of its business. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ________________________ Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #:17762 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you were or are a California resident who purchased one or both of the following from Life Insurance Company of the Southwest (“LSW”): SecurePlus Provider universal life insurance policy SecurePlus Paragon universal life insurance policy a class action lawsuit may affect your rights. Please read this notice carefully. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Individuals who purchased a SecurePlus Provider Policy or a SecurePlus Paragon Policy (“the Policies”) have sued LSW, alleging that LSW engaged in unfair, unlawful, and fraudulent business practices and committed fraud, by allegedly marketing the Policies as secure retirement or investment plans while allegedly concealing important facts and risks regarding the Policies. LSW denies these allegations and contends that no important facts or risks regarding the Policies were concealed. The United States District Court for the Central District of California (“the Court”) has ruled that the case may proceed as a class action on behalf of all individuals who purchased a SecurePlus Provider or a SecurePlus Paragon Policy from LSW on or after September 24, 2006 and who resided in California at the time the Policy was issued to them. The Court has not decided whether LSW did anything wrong. There is no money available now and there may never be. The primary purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the lawsuit so that you can make an informed decision as to whether you want to remain a member of the Class or exclude yourself from the Class. This lawsuit has not changed the terms of your insurance policy if it is in force, and all contractual guarantees remain in place and are not at risk. If you have any questions about your insurance policy other than about this Notice or this Class Action, you should contact LSW or your insurance agent as usual (contact information is below). Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 3 of 15 Page ID #:17763 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 2 YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: DO NOTHING You will remain a member of the Class and be part of this lawsuit. By doing nothing, you keep the possibility of getting money or benefits that may come from a trial or a settlement. But, you give up any rights to sue LSW separately about the legal claims in this lawsuit. ASK TO BE EXCLUDED You will not remain a member of the Class and will not be part of this lawsuit. If you ask to be excluded from the Class, and money or benefits are later awarded, you will not share in those. But, you keep any rights to sue LSW separately about the legal claims in this lawsuit. These rights and options – and the deadlines to exercise them – are explained in this notice. To be excluded from the Class, you must act by ________[75 days from date of notice]. Lawyers for the Class must still prove their claims against LSW in a trial, or there may be a settlement. The trial is set for __________, 2013. If money or benefits are obtained from LSW, you will be notified about how to receive the money or benefits. Any questions? Read on and visit [insert website address]. Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 4 of 15 Page ID #:17764 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 3 WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS BASIC INFORMATION ............................................................................. PAGE 4 1. Why did I get this notice package? 2. What is this lawsuit about? 3. What is a class action and who is involved? 4. Why is this a class action? THE CLAIMS IN THIS LAWSUIT.............................................................. PAGE 6 5. What does the lawsuit complain about? 6. How does LSW answer? 7. Has the Court decided who is right? 8. What are the Plaintiffs asking for? 9. Is there any money available now? WHO IS IN THE CLASS............................................................................ PAGE 9 10. Am I part of this Class? 11. Are any SecurePlus Provider or SecurePlus Paragon policyholders specifically excluded from the Class? 12. Do beneficiaries of deceased policyholders have rights in this lawsuit? YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS ................................................................. PAGE 10 13. What happens if I do nothing at all? 14. Why would I ask to be excluded? 15. How do I ask the Court to exclude me from the Class? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU .................................................... PAGE 11 16. Do I have a lawyer in the case? 17. Should I get my own lawyer? 18. How will the lawyers be paid? THE TRIAL .............................................................................................. PAGE 12 19. How and when will the Court decide who is right? 20. Do I have to come to the trial? GETTING MORE INFORMATION ............................................................. PAGE 13 21. Will I get money after the trial? 22. How do I get more information? Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 5 of 15 Page ID #:17765 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 4 BASIC INFORMATION 1. Why did I get this notice package? You are listed in LSW’s records as being a current or former owner of a SecurePlus Provider or SecurePlus Paragon indexed universal life insurance policy, who purchased your Policy from LSW on or after September 24, 2006, and who resided in California at the time your Policy was issued to you. The Court directed that the parties send you this notice because the Court has allowed, or “certified,” a class action lawsuit that may affect your rights. You have legal rights and options that you may exercise before the Court holds a trial. The trial will decide whether the claims being made against LSW, on your behalf, are correct or incorrect, and whether you or anyone else is or is not entitled to receive any money or benefits. This package explains the lawsuit, your legal rights, and your options. The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Santa Ana, California, and the case is known as Walker, et al. v. Life Insurance Company of the Southwest, Case No. CV-10-9198-JVS (RNBx). 2. What is this lawsuit about? This lawsuit relates to life insurance policies marketed and sold by LSW, known as the SecurePlus Provider Policy and the SecurePlus Paragon Policy (“the Policies”). Plaintiffs claim that LSW marketed the Policies as safe and secure retirement or investment plans that would purportedly provide the policyholder with significant retirement income, when in fact the structure of the Policies allegedly created a high risk that the Policy will “lapse” (meaning run out of money and terminate) or suffer reduced Policy value and that, if a Policy lapses, it will not deliver any tax advantages. Plaintiffs also contend that illustrations used in selling the Policies concealed substantial Policy fees and misrepresented guaranteed earnings and guaranteed caps on certain Policy fees. Plaintiffs claim that as a result of LSW’s misrepresentations and omissions, policyholders were induced to invest assets in the Policies which they were later unable to take out of the Policies due to the high fees charged for surrendering (giving up) the policy. Plaintiffs seek damages and an order prohibiting LSW from engaging in what they allege are unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent business practices. Plaintiffs also seek to give policyholders the option to undo (or “rescind”) the Policies and seek refunds of the premiums paid for the rescinded Policies. LSW disputes all of these claims and denies that it did anything wrong in its marketing and disclosures to policyholders. Specifically, LSW contends that the Policies are high-quality life insurance products that provide LSW’s policyholders and their beneficiaries with substantial death benefits. In addition, LSW contends that there is nothing in the structure of the Policies that create any particular risk of lapse or reduced policy value, and contends that all fees and guarantees were disclosed to policyholders (including because all fees and guarantees were incorporated into illustrated values, and allegedly were otherwise conveyed by agents, brochures, and/or in the Policy itself). Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 6 of 15 Page ID #:17766 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 5 3. What is a class action and who is involved? In a class action lawsuit, one or more persons, called Class Representatives (in this case Joyce Walker, Kim Bruce Howlett, and Muriel Spooner), sue on behalf of people (called “Class Members”) who have similar claims. The Class Representatives who sued – and all of the Class Members like them – are called the Plaintiffs. The company they sued (in this case LSW) is called a Defendant. One court resolves the issues for all Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Class. 4. Why is this a class action? United States District Judge James V. Selna of the United States District Court for the Central District of California (“Judge Selna” or “the Court”) is in charge of this case, and he has certified it as a class action. Judge Selna decided that this lawsuit can be a class action and move towards a trial because it meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, which governs class actions in federal courts. Specifically, the Court found that: LSW sold approximately 42,000 SecurePlus Paragon or SecurePlus Provider Policies to individuals in California on or after September 24, 2006; There are legal questions and facts that are common to each of these individuals; The claims of Class Representatives Walker, Howlett, and Spooner are typical of the claims of the rest of the Class; Walker, Howlett, and Spooner, and the lawyers representing the Class will fairly and adequately represent the Class’ interests; The common legal questions and facts predominate over any questions that affect only individuals; and This class action will be more efficient than having many individual lawsuits. More information about why the Court is allowing this lawsuit to be a class action is available at http://www._______. Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 7 of 15 Page ID #:17767 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 6 THE CLAIMS IN THIS LAWSUIT 5. What does this lawsuit complain about? The SecurePlus Provider Policy and the SecurePlus Paragon Policy (“the Policies”) are indexed universal life insurance policies which are sold and marketed by LSW as both a life insurance policy and an investment. In this lawsuit, the Plaintiffs claim that LSW engaged in unfair, unlawful, and fraudulent business practices and committed fraud by misrepresenting the Policies as safe and secure retirement and investment plans, while concealing important information about the Policies, including fees charged against the Policy value, how guaranteed interest is calculated on the Policy, and the significant risks of lapse or reduced Policy value because of how the Policies are structured. The Policies provide a death benefit if the policyholder dies while the Policy is in force. While the policyholder is alive, the Policy value can earn interest that is based on the performance of the S&P 500 Stock Index. This interest, along with premiums paid by the policyholder, becomes part of the cash value of the Policy. Numerous fees are charged against the Policy by LSW, which the Plaintiffs claim are not adequately disclosed; some fees are deducted directly from each premium payment, and additional fees are deducted from the accumulated value of the Policy each month. Surrender charges apply to the Policies in the event a policyholder wants to surrender the Policy within the first ten years. The Plaintiffs contend that LSW conceals significant risks that the Policies will decrease instead of increase in value and that the policyholder will not be able to realize any tax advantages from the Policy. Specifically, Plaintiffs contend: 1) that the internal structure of the Policy, combined with the natural volatility of the stock market, creates a high risk that the Policy value will decrease substantially or even cause the Policy to lapse and terminate without value. Plaintiffs allege that this risk is due to the interaction between natural S&P 500 volatility and the Policy design, including the existence of certain lapse- accelerating features of the Policy. This is called the “Volatility Defect Claim”; and 2) that although the Policy is designed to enable the policyholder to earn tax free retirement income through Policy loans, LSW does not disclose that the Policies are lapse-prone and that it is highly unlikely that the policyholder will be able to obtain any actual tax benefits, which would require the policyholder to keep paying LSW’s large Policy fees until the death of the insured person. If the Policy were to lapse with a loan outstanding, the policyholder would owe income taxes on any Policy earnings that were borrowed from the Policy, and the tax rate that the IRS would apply would be the higher rate for ordinary income and not the lower rate that usually applies to capital gains like investment earnings. This is called the “Tax Defect Claim.” Plaintiffs also contend that the Policy Illustration documents prepared by LSW and used by agents and brokers in the sale of the Policies are also misleading and deceptive, because they: 1) represent that the Policy has only “One Policy Fee” while in fact numerous fees are deducted from the policy value. This is called the “Non-Disclosure of Fees and Lapse Accelerators Claim”; Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 8 of 15 Page ID #:17768 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 7 2) represent that the Policy provides an annual interest guarantee of 2% (for Provider) and 2.5% (for Paragon), when in fact LSW provides no such guarantees. This is called the “Failure to Disclose That Interest Is Credited Retrospectively Claim”; and 3) represent that a future fee reduction that is described in the Illustration is guaranteed when in fact it is not guaranteed. This is called the “Illustrations Do Not Match Policy Re Eleventh Year Reduction in Fees Claim.” The Plaintiffs allege that as a result of LSW’s misrepresentations and nondisclosures regarding the Policies, purchasers of the Policies suffered money damages, including that they bought a Policy that was worth significantly less than the amount they paid for the Policy. You can read important pleadings in this case at [insert website address], including: Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action Complaint; LSW’s response (Answer) to the Second Amended Class Action Complaint; Judge Selna’s decision granting in part and denying in part LSW’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint; Judge Selna’s decision granting in part and denying in part LSW’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and Judge Selna’s decision granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. 6. How does LSW answer? LSW denies that it did anything wrong. Specifically, LSW stands by the quality of its Policies, and contends that the terms and features of its Policies are fully disclosed and set forth in a variety of materials and settings, including in conversations between policyholders and their agents or brokers and written materials (including the Policy itself, marketing materials, buyers’ guides, and illustrations). 7. Has the Court decided who is right? The Court has not decided whether LSW or the Plaintiffs are correct. By establishing the Class and issuing this Notice, the Court is not suggesting that the Plaintiffs or LSW will win or lose this case. The Plaintiffs must prove their claims and that they have incurred damages as a result of the conduct alleged at a trial in order to win unless the case is settled. The trial date is currently set for __________, 2013. (See “The Trial” below on page __.) Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 9 of 15 Page ID #:17769 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 8 8. What are the Plaintiffs asking for? The Plaintiffs want money damages including the amount LSW overcharged SecurePlus Provider and SecurePlus Paragon policyholders, with interest on those amounts (even if the Policy lapsed or was surrendered). In the alternative, Plaintiffs seek to give Class members the option to undo (“rescind”) the purchase of the Policy and get their premiums back without being subjected to a surrender charge if their Policy is still in force. Plaintiffs also want an award of punitive or exemplary damages against LSW to punish it for its misconduct, and an order prohibiting LSW from engaging in the unfair, unlawful, and fraudulent business practices alleged by the Plaintiffs. 9. Is there any money available now? No money or benefits are available now. The Court has not yet decided whether LSW did anything wrong and the two sides have not settled the case. There is no guarantee that money or benefits ever will be obtained. If money or other benefits become available, and you do not opt out of the Class, you will be notified about how to ask for a share of the money or benefits obtained. Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 10 of 15 Page ID #:17770 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 9 WHO IS IN THE CLASS 10. Am I part of this Class? In this case, there is one over-arching Class and a sub-Class. The Class consists of all current or former SecurePlus Provider or SecurePlus Paragon policyholders who resided in California at the time of Policy issuance and purchased the Policy on or after September 24, 2006. All Class Members are asserting claims under the California Unfair Competition Law (Business & Professions Code Section 17200) for LSW’s unfair, unlawful, and fraudulent business acts and practices with respect to the Policies, specifically the Volatility Defect Claim and the Tax Defect Claim described above. Class Members who purchased one of the Policies on or after September 24, 2007 are also asserting a fraud claim against LSW based on these allegations. Class Members who received a Policy Illustration document from LSW at or before the time they applied for their policy are also members of the sub-Class, and are asserting additional claims against LSW under the California Unfair Competition Law (Business & Professions Code Section 17200) based on misrepresentations and omissions contained in the Policy Illustration documents, specifically the Non-Disclosure of Fees and Lapse Accelerators Claim, the Failure to Disclose That Interest Is Credited Retrospectively Claim, and the Illustrations Do Not Match Policy Re Eleventh Year Reduction in Fees Claim described above. Sub-Class Members who purchased one of the Policies on or after September 24, 2007 are also asserting a fraud claim against LSW, based on these allegations. 11. Are any SecurePlus Provider or SecurePlus Paragon policyholders specifically excluded from the Class? Yes. The following persons are not included in the Class or the sub-Class: past or present officers, directors, agents, brokers, or employees of LSW, or its parent or subsidiary corporations; any agents, brokers, or others who sold the SecurePlus Provider or SecurePlus Paragon policies for LSW, or for its parent or subsidiary corporations; any entity in which LSW has a controlling interest; the affiliates, legal representatives, attorneys or assigns of LSW or its parent or subsidiary corporations; any judge, justice, or judicial officer presiding over this matter and the staff and immediate family of any such judge, justice, or judicial officer; persons who previously had settled disputes with LSW with respect to their SecurePlus Provider or SecurePlus Paragon policies and signed releases; and any person who submits a valid request to be excluded. 12. Do beneficiaries of deceased policyholders have rights in this lawsuit? Beneficiaries of deceased policyholders may be entitled to rights and benefits under this class action lawsuit. Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 11 of 15 Page ID #:17771 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 10 YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS If you meet the definition of a Class Member, you have to decide whether to stay in the Class or ask to be excluded from the Class. You have to decide this on or before ______[75 days from date of notice]. 13. What happens if I do nothing at all? You do not have to do anything now if you want to keep the possibility of getting money or benefits from this lawsuit. By doing nothing you are staying in the Class and, if you are a member of it, the sub- Class. If you stay in and the Plaintiffs obtain money or benefits, either as a result of the trial or a settlement, you will be notified about how to apply for a share (or how to ask to be excluded from any settlement). Keep in mind that if you do nothing now, regardless of whether the Plaintiffs win or lose the trial, you will not be able to sue, or continue to sue, LSW—as part of any other lawsuit—about the legal claims that are the subject of this lawsuit. You also will be legally bound by all of the rulings that the Court makes in this class action. 14. Why would I ask to be excluded? You may exclude yourself from the Class, which will also exclude you from the sub-Class described above. If you already have your own lawsuit against LSW based on the subject of this lawsuit and want to continue with it, you need to ask to be excluded from the Class. If you exclude yourself from the Class you will not get any money or benefits that may be awarded in this lawsuit even if the Plaintiffs obtain them as a result of the trial or from any settlement between LSW and the Plaintiffs. However, if you exclude yourself from the Class you may then be able to sue or continue to sue LSW. If you start your own lawsuit against LSW after you exclude yourself, you will have to hire and pay your own lawyer for that lawsuit, and you will have to prove your claims. If you do exclude yourself so you can start or continue your own lawsuit against LSW, you should talk to your own lawyer soon, because your claims may be subject to a time limit, known as a statute of limitations. 15. How do I ask the Court to exclude me from the Class? To ask to be excluded, you must send an “Exclusion Request” in the form of a letter sent by mail, stating that you want to be excluded from Walker v. LSW. Be sure to include your name and address, and sign the letter. You must mail your Exclusion Request postmarked by _________, to: Walker v. LSW Exclusions, P.O. Box _____, _________. You may also get an Exclusion Request form at the website, [insert website address]. Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 12 of 15 Page ID #:17772 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 11 THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU 16. Do I have a lawyer in this case? Yes. The Court decided that the attorneys at two law firms – Kasowitz, Benson, Torres, & Friedman LLP, and the Law Offices of Craig A. Miller – are qualified to represent you and all Class Members. Together, the lawyers are called Class Counsel. They are experienced in handling similar cases. Information about either law firm can be found by visiting the websites listed below: Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman LLP www.kasowitz.com Charles N. Freiberg Brian P. Brosnahan 101 California Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 421-6140 Law Offices of Craig A. Miller www.craigmillerlaw.com Craig A. Miller 225 Broadway, Suite 1310 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 231-9449 You will not be charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 17. Should I get my own lawyer? You do not need to hire your own lawyer because Class Counsel is working on your behalf. But, if you want your own lawyer, you will have to pay that lawyer. For example, you can ask him or her to appear in Court for you if you want someone other than Class Counsel to speak for you. 18. How will the Class Counsel lawyers be paid? You will not be charged personally for these lawyers. Class Counsel are working on behalf of the Class on a contingency basis and will only be paid if a benefit is obtained for the Class and the Court approves the fees and expenses requested by Class Counsel. If the Court grants Class Counsel’s request, the fees and expenses would either be paid by LSW or deducted, in whole or in part, from monies obtained for the Class, in an amount to be determined by the Court. Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 13 of 15 Page ID #:17773 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 12 THE TRIAL 19. How and when will the Court decide who is right? If the case is not resolved by a settlement or otherwise, it will be up to Class Counsel to prove the Plaintiffs’ claims and any damages at a trial. Attorneys for LSW will defend LSW at trial. The trial date is currently set for ____________, 2013, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Ronald Reagan Federal Building, 411 West Fourth Street, Courtroom 10C, Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516. During the trial, a jury or the judge will hear all of the evidence to help them reach a decision about whether the Plaintiffs or LSW is right about the claims in the lawsuit. There is no guarantee that the Plaintiffs will win or that they will get any money for the Class. If you do not request exclusion from the Class, you will be notified of any proposed settlement or any recovery by Plaintiffs at trial. Be sure to report any changes to your address following receipt of this Notice to: [address] 20. Do I have to come to the trial? You do not need to attend the trial unless you choose to do so. Class Counsel will present the case for the Class, and LSW will present its defenses. You and/or your own lawyer are welcome to come at your own expense. Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 14 of 15 Page ID #:17774 QUESTIONS? CALL 1-800-XXX-XXXX OR VISIT WWW.______.COM 13 GETTING MORE INFORMATION 21. Will I get money after the trial? If the Plaintiffs obtain money or benefits as a result of the trial or a settlement, you will be notified about how to participate. We do not know how long this will take. Court orders and other important information about the case will be posted on the website, www.____.com, as they become available. You can access the website to obtain current information about this case, whether you stay in the lawsuit or exclude yourself. 22. How do I get more information? This Notice serves only as a summary of the Class Action. For additional information about this Notice or this Class Action, you can call 1-800________ toll free; write to __________; or visit the website at ________. Please do not call the Court or the Court Clerk. For information about your insurance policy other than about this Notice or this Class Action, you can contact LSW or your insurance agent by calling 1-800-732-8939; write to LifeCustomerService@NationalLife.com; or visit the website at www.nationallifegroup.com. This lawsuit has not changed the terms of your insurance policy if it is in force, and all contractual guarantees remain in place. Case 2:10-cv-09198-JVS-RNB Document 403-1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 15 of 15 Page ID #:17775